Just Labradors banner

1 - 8 of 8 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,782 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Police: Mom drugged daughter so she'd get pregnant
The Associated Press • April 3, 2009

UNIONTOWN, Pa. (AP) — Police say a western Pennsylvania mother drugged her 13-year-old daughter so the woman's boyfriend could get the girl pregnant.

Uniontown police say 32-year-old Shana Brown is no longer able to have children, but wanted a baby with her boyfriend.

A detective says Brown and her boyfriend attempted to impregnate the girl on three occasions. He says the girl prevented the rapes. The girl's paternal grandmother reported the incidents to police in the town about 50 miles south of Pittsburgh.

Brown is facing several charges, including endangering the welfare of children. Brown's attorney didn't immediately return a call for comment.

The boyfriend, 40-year-old Duane Calloway, faces charges of attempted rape. It wasn't immediately clear if he has an attorney.

That just makes me SICK:mad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
44,122 Posts
She does that to her own daughter and wants another baby?! She'll get hers in jail, so will he. :mad: :mad:

attempted to impregnate the girl on three occasions. He says the girl prevented the rapes.
Good for her!!!!!
 

·
Registered Users
Joined
·
10,466 Posts
Inject them both with cancer cells & throw the bastards in jail to die a slow death with no medical help whatsoever. In fact I vote the daughter be given the task of jabbing the bastards as revenge.

Effing sick evil bastards! :mad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
311 Posts
So it implies the first woman originally had the daughter at age 19. That's the first sign she's a total loser, the rest just confirms it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
13,130 Posts
So it implies the first woman originally had the daughter at age 19. That's the first sign she's a total loser, the rest just confirms it.

That's not a fair statement and a pretty wrong one.

I hope they rot in hell. What they will endure in prison is nothing to what this poor girl will have to go through for the rest of her life.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
23,457 Posts
So it implies the first woman originally had the daughter at age 19. That's the first sign she's a total loser, the rest just confirms it.
The age at which the mother had her first child has nothing whatsoever to do with this. Does your poor judgment say you are an idiot? :confused:
 
1 - 8 of 8 Posts
Top