Food for thought....
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Food for thought....

  1. #1
    3TailsWaggin's Avatar
    3TailsWaggin is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    10,258

    DefaultFood for thought....

    I don't know what happened, I wasn't even in the same building as the regular obedience folk, but I got this letter in my email. I think the writer has some really valid points that should be considered when showing your dogs. I'm posting it here just for food for thought.

    After last weekendís trial, it was brought to my attention that one of our club members was overheard to make a remark about the unfairness of a certain handler winning all the time. This comment was made about a friend of mine and I find I just canít let it go. Something like this shows bad sportsmanship and paints our club in a bad light.



    First of all it should not matter to anyone what other exhibitors doÖ Yes it is a competitive sport, but the competition is against a standard of perfection Ė that 200 score. Handlers who excel at the sport donít think about beating other exhibitors, they think about how they can make their dogís run better and have a vision of the perfect run in mind. The competition should be against YOURSELF and YOUR ability to train your dog to a higher standard.



    The way to excel is to work harder then everyone else. If you find yourself feeling someone is doing more then their share of winning, ask them about the work that they are putting into it and work harder then they are. How many books have your read or training videos have you watched lately? How many email lists are you on to hear how others overcome training/showing challenges and to get input on how to address yours? Do you subscribe to Front and Finish? Have you gone to a seminar lately? Do you train every day? Twice a day? No matter how hot/cold/wet it is? Have you read any motivational books on sports psychology and how to achieve a winning mindset? Did you sit ringside at our trial and watch the really good dogs (We had three competitors at our trial who competed at the NOI, representing their breeds and holding their own against the best of the best)? Did you analyze the performances of Open and Utility B to see what those coming close to and achieving perfection are doing that you arenít? Did you talk to any of the winners of the classes to find out how they train, who they train with, or what methods they use to teach an exercise? Do you have a standard of perfection in your mind so you know what youíre working toward? Could you tell the difference between a 195 run, a 198 run, and a 200 run? Have you read the rule book? Did you have your run video taped so you can critique it Monday morning and learn what you need to do to be better at the next trial. If you want to be one of the winning handlers, that is where you start.



    Have you noticed that the winning handlers seem to congregate in a group and watch each otherís runs? They are not watching to see who Ďbeatsí them or who they Ďbeatí. Theyíre going to give each other help and advice when needed, watch the progress of each otherís dogs and use that information in training their own dogs. They help each other and are inspired by each otherís good performances. They donít complain when someone else wins, they train harder to make THEIR performances better.



    My goals for my dogs are to get as high a score as I am able and to get OTCHs on them. That involves winning or at least placing high in the class. Sometimes I do that and sometimes I donít. When I donít itís because Iíve gotten lax on my training and Iím not putting the work into it that I should, not communicating appropriately to my dog and Iím not staying on top of my gameÖ. Itís not the fault of someone who has been working harder then I have; itís not my dogís fault that Iíve failed to train him properly; itís not the judgeís fault, he/she can only judge the performance we gave him today. By the way, if you donít think you got the score you deserve, ASK the judge and most are more then willing to explain to you where and why you are losing points, often itís not the dog doing something to lose pts., itís the handler!



    AKC has set up the obedience system so that each person can achieve their goals Ė whether a title earned with three scores in the 170ís, a UDX to demonstrate a consistently qualifying dog no matter what the scores, an Obedience Master for a dog who consistently scores in at least the 190ís or an OTCH, for dogs/handlers that excel in the sport. Of ALL those titles the only one that requires you place in a class is the OTCH. If you want to train to earn titles and donít want to put the extra work in it to achieve excellence, then fine - thatís your goal and itís a worthwhile one. Please donít make remarks about the people who have put the work into the sport to rise to the next level of competition. What theyíre doing should not make one bit of difference to you or affect your goals for your dogÖ.

  2. Remove Advertisements
    JustLabradors.com
    Advertisements
     

  3. #2
    Milesmom's Avatar
    Milesmom is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Chesterland, Ohio
    Posts
    742

    Default

    Linda, it sounds like nothing major happened, just that someone made a remark and this person in your club feels that it makes the club look bad. I think it is interesting how she handled it. She probably sent this to the whole club believing that everyone can learn from it. I am glad she did because you posted it and I learned from it too.

    It sounds like the remark was sour grapes and this sport, like all sports (your club, like all clubs) are made up of people. People, unfortunately don't always behave their best.

    Your friend's email makes some very good points that are good reminders for all of us. Yes, some dogs are easier to train than others, but none just get up and start performing beautifully without a lot of consistent work with their handler. Yes, 99.9% of the time, the problems in the ring are the handler. A handler who puts a lot of time and effort into (and is open minded to where they may need to change how they do things) will learn to be a better handler than someone who doesn't.

    I have made lots of "dog friends" since I started trialing and going to class. Unbelievably, the majority take their dogs to weekly dog class and enter trials. They do nothing in between and they wonder why they don't do better than they do. "Are you practicing?" "No, I don't have time." "Well, Okay then.". That's kind of how the conversation goes. Those that do work on their skills see fairly steady improvement, some faster than others, but steady.

    Thanks for posting the note. I am reminded that I need to make sure I read the articles my trainer gives me and I really should subscribe to that magazine. I have been a bit lax on my reading lately!

    Ann & Miles
    MACH ARCHEX "Miles" (DOB 3/10/2006) UD RAE MXS MJS OF CW-OB3 CW-ARF CW-AR CW-ZR2 CL-1 (DOB 3/10/2006)
    "Hartley" (DOB 7/21/2012) RN CGC CW-OB1

  4. #3
    2yellowlabs is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    574

    Default

    While I was reading the letter, I found myself thinking this person doth protest too much. Everything she said is true - in theory - efforts equal results. But come on - life is not always fair and sometimes people do coast on their reputation. It reminds me of what they say about ice dancing - very few teams burst on the scene and win the big events. Instead you put in your time and if you are really good, you begin to move up. I think the same thing happens in OB trials. Very few dogs win HIT from the Novice Class or even from the A classes. Yet, when dogs get to Open B & Utility B and are shown frequently, many seem to be in the ribbons regularly. Does that mean they are always the 4 best dogs in the ring that day? Maybe but not always. Just like with anything, some judges are more fair and some less so. Well known in our area is usually better than unknown at least until you show quite a bit and become a known. Perhaps the person who repeated the remark to the person who wrote the letter, didn't quite get the whole context, or maybe the person who complained was just being a poor sport. But maybe that person thought someone else had done a better job than the consistent winner on that day and was protesting that unfairness.
    Betsy
    Kelleygreens Couer D'Or, CGC,CD, RAE2 - Doro - Nov. 21, 1995 to Jan. 14, 2010
    Kelleygreens The Shamrock Kid, CGC, OM, UDX2, RE, NA, NAJ, AXP, AJP, ASCA CDX, - Shamrock
    Kelleygreens The Few, The Proud, CGC, CDX, GN, NA - Recon

  5. Remove Advertisements
    JustLabradors.com
    Advertisements
     

  6. #4
    Milesmom's Avatar
    Milesmom is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Chesterland, Ohio
    Posts
    742

    Default

    Good point, Betsy. Any time you have human beings involved, things will be imperfect. Even a judge who is trying to be fair and unbiased never can be so completely. It just isn't possible. We are all looking at situations through our own filters.

    Ann & Miles
    MACH ARCHEX "Miles" (DOB 3/10/2006) UD RAE MXS MJS OF CW-OB3 CW-ARF CW-AR CW-ZR2 CL-1 (DOB 3/10/2006)
    "Hartley" (DOB 7/21/2012) RN CGC CW-OB1

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-02-2009, 07:53 AM
  2. Food for thought...
    By imported_bearsdad in forum Lab Chat
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-15-2007, 05:47 PM
  3. Food For Thought
    By 3TailsWaggin in forum Natural/Raw Diets and Holistic Care
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-11-2007, 01:39 PM
  4. Food for thought or not ?????
    By Charlie4r2 in forum Lab Health and Nutrition
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-27-2006, 06:24 PM
  5. Food for thought ....
    By Blazes Mom in forum Lab Chat
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-17-2006, 04:48 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25