This was forwarded to me by my breeder:
Justice for Jack
A Dog-Owner's Story of Loss and Raising Awareness
Posted on May 29, 2012&nb=p;
One of our beloved dogs, Jack, a 6-year-old, chow-lab mix, died yesterday. His death was very unexpected and traumatic. Although, our dogs did not receive the same amount of attention as they did before Bobby was born, they were still loved dearly. Bob walked them religiously every single day. Jack loved, loved, loved, playing fetch. Tennis balls were his favorite. When we discovered that he had died, we began questioning what happened to our sweet Jack.
On Monday, May 7, we took both of our dogs to our vet for their annual check ups. It was a very routine visit. They were both checked for heartworms and parasites, weighed, and listened to. They were deemed normal and healthy. They both received their rabies vaccinations, and a new drug (via injection) that was recommend by our vet, ProHeart 6. Our vet simply said, "Hey, we have this new shot that we can give them for heartworm protection instead of an oral preventative. It's easy because it's only one dose every 6 months." Sounded good to us, so we agreed. That was it. That was all the information we received, and-by our own fault-all we asked for.
Both of the dogs seemed=20 fine the first week home, then Jack started acting differently. He didn't want to go on his daily walks. He didn't want to fetch his tennis ball. He didn't want to eat his dog food. My husband even tried giving him some leftover steak from our dinner, and Jack wouldn't eat it. We knew something was up, so we took him back to the vet on Monday, May 21.
The vet discovered that=20 Jack had a fever, but could find nothing else wrong with him. He was given a steroid shot and some antibiotics in case he had an infection, and we were sent home. Over the next few days, Jack seemed to feel better. He was still a little lethargic, but was eating and perked up when we threw a ball or petted him. He seemed on the mend. We thought he must have just had a virus and was getting better. It did not even cross our minds that he was so gravely ill, so we continued with our Memorial Day plans to go to the beach.
We returned from the beach to a grim discovery-Jack dead in a pool of blood and vomit. His poor little body was crumpled up in a strange way, like he had literally just fallen over dead. We took him to an animal ER where they confirmed that he was dead, and we paid to have his body cremated. The vet at the animal ER stated that it appeared to be a heart attack or cardiopulmonary problem that killed him.
That evening, as we wrestled with grief and trying to explain death to our 3-year-old son, we began to question what on earth had happened to our previously perky puppy. Okay-he wasn't a puppy, but he always behaved like a frisky, fun puppy, and he certainly wasn't an old dog. We considered the possibility that he ate something bad, but his vet had all but ruled out a GI problem. We went over and over what was different, the only thing we had changed was their heartworm medicine.
We googled the shot he =ad received a few weeks earlier, ProHe=rt 6. The drug was originally made by a division of Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, but the drug company Pfizer acquired Wyeth and all of its holdings in 2009. Pfizer's own website lists side effects of the drug as lethargy, loss of appetite, vomiting, and death. (Source: Pfizer
After doing further research, we also discovered that the drug was originally pulled off the market in 2004 for a high rate of adverse reactions to the drug. "According to an informed veterinarian, 'Proheart caused more deaths in one year than all of the oral heartworm preventives combined did in ten years. When the FDA notified Pfizer that their drug was causing a problem, the manufacturer claimed it was due to the vaccines' being given at the same time. The FDA looked at the data again and told them the dogs involved had been getting their vaccinations all along and the only difference was the Proheart. That's when the FDA informed the company of their intent to pull it and the company then voluntarily took it off the market."
Pfizer was allowed to=20 re-market the drug in 2008 with the following stipulations: Pfizer agreed to add additional warning labels to the drug packaging, and agreed to mandate that pet owners be given a drug fact sheet and be made to sign an "informed consent" document. Pfizer went even further as to mandate web-based training for veterinarians who gave the drug, and issued several "Dear Doctor" letters to all veterinarians regarding the adverse effects of the drug. (Read one o= the "Dear Doctor" letters here.)
The part that bothered=20 and alarmed us the most was this line from the drug's website: "ProHeart 6 dog owners must be advised of the risks of ProHeart 6 and sign an Owner Consent Form prior to the first administration." (Source: Pfizer)
We were never shown a=20 fact sheet on the drug, never "advised of the risks", and certainly not given an Owner Consent Form" by our vet to sign. (In hindsight, we feel that we should have asked more questions about the drug, but we trusted our veterinarian.) If the side effects had been presented to us as they have in our research, we would NOT have consented to have Pro Heart 6 administered to our dogs.
We also found some literature suggesting that ProHeart 6 should not be administered at the same time as vaccinations: "Allergic reactions, sometimes serious, have been reported when ProHeart 6 and vaccinations have been given at the same time. Talk to your veterinarian about the risks of administering ProHeart 6 at the same time as vaccinations." (Source link here.) Our vet administered ProHeart 6 at the same time=as Jack rabies vaccine, and distemper/bordetella.
The drug's information=20 page from Drugs.com states the following: "Owners should be advised of the potential for adverse reactions, including anaphylaxis, and be i=formed of the clinical signs associated with drug toxicity. Owners =hould be advised to contact their veterinarian immediately if signs of tox=city are observed. The vast majority of patients with drug related adverse reactions have recovered when the signs are recognized and veterinary care, if appropriate, is initiated." (Source: Drugs.com=
When we did recognize=20 that something was going on with our dog, we did what we thought good pet owners are supposed to do. We took him back to the vet. The vet should have recognized that he was having an adverse reaction to the ProHeart6 that she administered to him (without our "informed= consent) only weeks earlier and treated him appropriately. If the vetrinarian had recognized his symptoms, he could have recovered. She did not, and as a result, our otherwise healthy dog died. Now, we are left waiting on the drug to work its way out of our remaining dog's system praying that she does not fall victim to the same fate.
Stories of dogs that died as a result of being administered this drug are abundant. Please, ask for all of the facts, side effects, and more information when your vet (or doctor) recommends this drug (or any drug). ProHeart 6 provides no additional benefits or protection than safer, oral heartworm preventatives.
May 30 UPDATE:
I truly appreciate all of your condolences and support, and all of you who have shared this blog on your social media sites. It makes me feel much better knowing that we are raising consumer consciousness.
We aren't trying to tel= you what to do with your pets, just encouraging you to gather information=before making any decisions.
A vet that works for Pf=zer, the drug manufacturer, contacted us today to ask us if we would let t=em do an autopsy necropsy on Jack. (They had already called the crematorium to make sure his body had not been cremated yet.) We agreed. In fact, we felt relieved and feel that we will get some answers soon. His body is now on the way to the University of Florida to be examined by experts.
Our other dog does not =eem to be exhibiting the same symptoms (so far thank goodness).=/div>
May 31 UPDATE:
Pfizer called back today to let us know they were planning on reimbursing =s for the money we paid to have Jack cremated.
His body is being sent =o a different lab in Florida and it will be 4-6 weeks before we get a full=autopsy necropsy report. They are doing tissue samples, toxicol=gy... The whole nine yards.
Pfizer seems as interes=ed in getting answers as we do. Which is more than we can say for our (for=er) vet.
The vet has not responded to our requests for answers. (I.e. Did the vet who administered the shot complete Pfizer's mandatory training? Why were we not given the "Owner Consent Form" and drug fact sheet? Why did the vet not recognize Jack's symptoms when we took him back in?)
I have received lots of=20 emails and messages from others who have lost their pets. My heart goes out to you. Some have asked me to publicly name the vet. I'm not going to do that (yet). I may, or may not, do that when we receive the autopsy results. At that time, we will know who is truly culpable. In the meantime, just be sure to ask your vet (or doctor for that matter) for lots of information before consenting to anything.
***While the majority o= comments have been supportive, some have not. You are entitled to your opinion, but please note that I will not publish comments that contain threatening or vulgar language. Nor will I publish comments that are anonymous. ****
For those of you following this story, further updates will be posted to my="Justice for Jack" post.
That is so sad! I would be suing the vet for negligence if in fact he was required by Pfizer to supply a consent form in order to even carry this drug in his office. Sadly though aside from the vet not being diligent in offering the info, as a pet owner you have to be proactive to ensure the safety of your pets by asking questions, too often a trust is built with a vet and we just rely on them to do their best in the best interest of our pets. As much as I trust our vet, I am always cautious with any type of doctor (for humans or animals) and make sure I know what I'm getting into.
I had heard of these bad reactions A LONG time ago. A friends RR had a severe reaction shortly after it first came out. No way in hell would I give something like that to my dogs. I am kind of surprized they still make it.
Karen and the gang
BBI Kodi's Journey To Anotch (Journey)
BBI Kodi's Blackpowder Striker (Flint)
The very notion of an injected pesticide that is efficacious for SIX MONTHS being safe in a dog's body seems quite nuts to me.
Shame on the vet blindly recommending it.
Sharon, Blaise and Diesel.
I did not know it was still on the market. Many years ago, when it first came out, our old vet (we no longer use him) wanted us to give our lab Pro Heart 6. He said "you won't have to give a pill every month, it's good for six months." First of all, I never give my dogs anything that has not been on the market for at least five years and second, being a nurse, I did not like the fact of injecting a medicine that was going to last six months......how are they sure it will be released & absorbed for six months. It had to be a pretty powerful dose & I did not like that. The vet wasn't happy when we said no.
It wasn't long after that when I started reading about dogs having adverse reactions & dying after getting Pro Heart 6. They were developing heart problems. We switched vets soon after I heard about this. It is just so sad.
You just never know how a dog will react to vaccines or medications but you can certainly question something that is injected into your dog that will be effective for six months.
How awful! Thanks so much for sharing. There are so many things out there, and we as pet owners don't always know what to do. We trust our vet to help us know what is best. Your vet didn't do what was required. Even though it won't bring your sweet boy back, I'd get a lawyer. At least the vet could be stopped making this kind of error with others. That waiver definately should have been brought to the owner's attention.
Last edited by Sophiesmama; 06-11-2012 at 07:59 PM.
Sophie DOB 04/13/2011 6 mo
Sophie 15 months, with Skye
Sophie DOB 04/13/2011 6 mo
Sophie 15 months, with Skye